|
Posted by PTravel on 10/28/07 17:39
"Frank" <frank@nojunkmail.humanvalues.net> wrote in message
news:hhh9i3tk16n74v0jhpvidl5eih4mji3icd@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:34:15 +0000, in 'rec.video.production',
> in article <Re: Starting to think about HD>,
> Martin Heffels <goofie@flikken.net> wrote:
>
>>By the way, I'm ctaching-up with the news, so it's a bit late for you now,
>>but maybe for your purposes this one
>>http://www.simonwyndham.co.uk/xdcam-pmw-ex1.html would be better.
>
>
> That's exactly and precisely what I had been trying to push him
> toward, Martin, especially since he had specified February as a
> probable buying point, thus allowing for the publication of not just
> the usual product reviews, but also reports of real life end user
> experiences, but to no avail.
>
> It has been said that you can lead a horse to water, but you can't
> make it drink.
A solid-state storage camera isn't an option for me. I'm on the road for
weeks at a time, which makes solid state impractical (and far too
expensive), plus I use tape as an archive medium. As it happens, we're
going to Angkor Wat over the holidays and I want to shoot the temple in HD.
I have reasons for most things that I do.
>
> --
> Frank, Independent Consultant, New York, NY
> [Please remove 'nojunkmail.' from address to reply via e-mail.]
> Read Frank's thoughts on HDV at http://www.humanvalues.net/hdv/
> (also covers AVCHD and XDCAM EX).
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|