|
|
Posted by ChairmanOfTheBored on 10/30/07 00:49
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:57:52 -0700, "Richard C." <post-age@spamcop.net>
wrote:
>"T.B." <partyslammer@socal.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:4726064d$0$28824$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> ChairmanOfTheBored" aka "DoucheMatter" farted:
>>>>
>>>>> Whatever. Both will survive. Y'all need to get that through yer
>>>>> thick
>>>>> skulls.
>>>>
>>>>Yeah, for example, competing SACD and DTS audio formats really helped
>>>>each
>>>>other out and have since florished beyond all expectations.
>>>>
>>>>Dumbass.
>>>>
>>>>T.B.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fucking idiot. DTS as well as THX are in use by the movie industry
>>> studios.
>>>
>>> SACD is a completely different animal altogether, idiot.
>>>
>>> In other words, dumbfuck, you are talking "Apples and Oranges".
>>
>> Yo, clod.
>>
>> DTS (DVD) audio and SACD were competing "hi-res" audio cd formats. Here
>> is a article from '05 that might illuminate that black hole of a brain you
>> have taking up space in that mellon-sized head of yours.
>>
>> http://forum.ecoustics.com/bbs/messages/34579/130868.html
>>
>> Can you hear me McFly? Anyone home?!?
>>
>> T.B.
>=====================================
>The competing "hi-res" audio fromats are DVD-Audio and SACD.
>=====================================
Not are. WERE.
And now BOTH are overshadowed by TrueHD, etc.
Hell, even FLAC and OGG likely beats them, and it is on PCs!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|