|
|
Posted by Gaz on 10/31/07 22:38
"the dog from that film you saw" <dsb@removethisportionbtinternet.com> wrote
in message news:5mn7tsFe0uk5U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Mike" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:13gc71v8k2e125d@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "A.Xino" <aaronmlb@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1191577243.347287.324920@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>>> On 5 Oct, 00:17, "Mike" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>> Thinking of getting one. Anyone any experience of them?
>>>
>>> They'll work within your home, but don't believe the promise of
>>> watching your home TV or listening to your mp3 collection from
>>> anywhere in the world. It may be possible theoretically, but you'll be
>>> very lucky if it actually works in practice, certainly not at any
>>> reasonable level.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Don't see the point why anyone would use it in the home, I have a
>> digisender at a quarter of the cost to do that.
>> I was thinking more for abroad use. I have my concerns/doubts but user
>> reviews general seem favourable.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> it's all dependent on your internet connection - and not the fast download
> but the crappy upload.
> unless you can provide a few mb upload you'll be stuck with sub youtube
> quality - and it would have to be a pretty special tv show to put up with
> that.
>
my 10 a month sky broadband, gives me 768 upload on a line thats about
6km..... That is fine for slingbox.
Gaz
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|