|
|
Posted by Frank on 11/01/07 20:03
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:14:04 -0700, in 'rec.video.production',
in article <Re: Starting to think about HD>,
"nappy" <n@n.n> wrote:
>
>"nappy" <n@n.n> wrote in message
>news:4ZmWi.3852$Nz7.2868@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>
>> "Frank" <frank@nojunkmail.humanvalues.net> wrote in message
>> news:lr3ai397ersphcqsbr1mod6pf9a4v2d3s3@4ax.com...
>>> When it comes to comparisons, especially of the low-light flavor, I
>>> especially like the following two images.
>>>
>>> http://www.slashcam.de/images/texte/564-Low_HVX-HVX200Low.jpg
>>>
>>> http://www.slashcam.de/images/texte/564-Low_Sony-LowEx.jpg
>>>
>>
>>
>> It's like night and day!
>>
>> :)
>>
>>
>>
>
>Of course.. You're comparing a camera that has been out for a couple years
>to one that isn't on the market yet. But no doubt the Sony's Low light
>performance is quite good. I wish the HVX's was better. Although I usually
>get to light what we shoot!
I never question someone who replies to their own post. :-)
--
Frank, Independent Consultant, New York, NY
[Please remove 'nojunkmail.' from address to reply via e-mail.]
Read Frank's thoughts on HDV at http://www.humanvalues.net/hdv/
(also covers AVCHD and XDCAM EX).
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|