|
|
Posted by Patrick Vervoorn on 11/02/07 19:55
In article <kPIWi.459$C8.221@bos-service2b.ext.ray.com>,
Kinon O'Cann <somewhere@over.the.rainbow> wrote:
>
>"Patrick Vervoorn" <patrick.vervoorn@NOSPAM.perihelion.demon.nl> wrote in
>message news:d739a$472b4530$82a1d3bf$18180@news2.tudelft.nl...
>> Well, I'm not doing _any_ photo editting at all, so that would not be a
>> deciding factor to go for an IPS vs another type of panel.
>>
>> I suppose the links above explain this, but I haven't looked into them, so
>> forgive my following question: what other advantages does an IPS panel
>> have over the other panel technologies?
>
>Best to read the above technical articles, since you really need to match
>the panel to the use. If you're not editing, but gaming, then a panel with a
>better response time would work better.
Yeah, I read them this evening, and interesting stuff. Seems I didn't do
too bad, and couldn't have done much better, since in the 22" WS arena,
only TN Panels are available.
Also, I use my monitor mostly for gaming, and some secondary
browsing/internet/etc use, so I'm not too interested in life-like colors.
Nonetheless, if/when the 22" Iiyama VM510 CRT I'm typing this on ever
dies, I'll try to see if a nice S-IPS panel based LCD is available which
also has a quick respons time. I've seen a few which are about 5ms, so it
is possible, but not in the 22" WS format. Yet anyway.
Thanks for the insights in any case. ;)
Regards, Patrick.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|