|
|
Posted by My Name Is Nobody on 11/05/07 04:17
"Mike Kujbida" <kXuXjXfXaXm@xplornet.com> wrote in message
news:5p7eggFpvqg5U1@mid.individual.net...
> My Name Is Nobody wrote:
>> "Smarty" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message
>> news:fT%Vi.8449$8R1.7716@trndny02...
>>> Announced yesterday:
>>>
>>> http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/CamInfo-Selects-2007-33545.htm#HDV
>>>
>>> "Best High Definition" - All Media and the review states:
>>>
>>> "The HV20 has the best looking picture we've seen all year, and serves
>>> the
>>> needs of almost any type of shooting a consumer is likely to come
>>> across.
>>> The fact that it can be purchased for less than $1,000 is remarkable,
>>> and
>>> only one of its many compelling features."
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Now if Canon or anyone else could supply a software to edit the HV20's
>> true 1080i 1920x1080 movies...
>
>
> I have no problems editing HDV footage (even AVCHD footage) with my quad
> core.
I have no problems editing HDV with my (purpose built) dual Xeon machine
either, hardware wasn't my problem...
And it is beginning to seem software wasn't either... :-(((
>
>
>> I may have waited to buy my Canon HV20 if I realized there was NO
>> consumer software available that allows you to work in true 1080i
>> 1920x1080...
>
>
> Sony Vegas does it very easily.
Yes at 1440x1080, it does indeed.
>
>
>> And No, Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 and Sony Vegas Movie Studio Platinum 7.0
>> both seems to think 1440x1080 is true 1080i... :-(((
>
>
> That's because it is. The PAR (Pixel Aspect Ratio) of an HDV signal is
> 1.333 which, when multiplied by , comes to 1920 (1919.52, to be precise).
OK so, please explain why an HDV signal is referred to as both 1440x1080 and
1920x1080? I seem to have missed some distinction.
Thanks
>
> Mike
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|