|
|
Posted by nappy on 11/10/07 17:51
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fh4ncr$l9t$1@aioe.org...
> On a sunny day (Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:25:27 GMT) it happened Larry in AZ
> <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in
> <Xns99E45F5F5B90Bthefrogprince@69.28.173.184>:
>
>>Waiving the right to remain silent, Johan Stck <johan@stack.se> said:
>>
>>> But I am still hoping to get some feedback on my initial question:
>>> What is the reason for having interlaced camcorders *today* with
>>> virtually all end-user gear (TV sets, computer screens etc) needing to
>>> convert it to progressive (by means of de-interlacing) before displaying
>>> it?
>>
>>"Virtually all" end-user sets *are not* progressive. There are tens of
>>millions of CRT sets still in use.
>
> Desktop:
> http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,2181410,00.asp?kc=ETRSS02129TX1K0000532
> TV
> http://www.digitalworldtokyo.com/index.php/digital_tokyo/articles/big_screen_crt_tv_business_in_japan_all_but_over/
>
> Many people will upgrade to LCD, with HDTV and digital coming.
> There were no CRT TVs in the shops here in Europe, last time I looked.
> Sure, some people have one at home, some people also have manual coffee
> grinding machines,
> and some people even pay in dollars, while the world has moved to Euros
> years ago.
> ;-)
In the US there are still many CRT versions on shelves in large stores. Lots
of them.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|