|
|
Posted by Jyeshta on 12/24/07 17:06
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 04:48:22 -0000, "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com>
wrote:
>Greg Farr wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:58:23 -0800 (PST), nycram
>> <gvellenzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 23, 10:11 am, Greg Farr <gregf...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:43:51 +0000, anthonyberet <nos...@me.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Greg Farr wrote:
>>>>>> I just cleaned up my 98SE with a defrag and more and when I
>>>>>> started Winmx tonite, the text in the box up top on the left was
>>>>>> blank, where it did have info on the latest patch and some other
>>>>>> words referring to that, now it white, blank. Any one know how to
>>>>>> get it back?
>>>>
>>>>> That message comes from the cache server that you are connecting
>>>>> to. Is it connecting ok? If so, it jsut means the config of that
>>>>> cache server has been changed.
>>>>
>>>> It's running ok, except I did get some of those runaway movie files,
>>>> where the number of up loaders keeps increasing in an unrealistic
>>>> way, and it's best to deleted them. Otherwise, it's fine with good
>>>> numbers. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Greghttp://gregsplace.50megs.comhttp://www.picturetrail.com/fugitive1
>>>
>>> Why not go to the horse's mouth---do the mxpie connection test:
>>>
>>> http://www.mxpie.info/tools/mxpie_test.html
>>
>>
>> I wanted to, but since my window was blank, it wouldn't let me, so I
>> just d/l the newest one and installed. 3.6, I think. Thanks
>> PS, Does anyone know what is with the d/l of films that have
>> multiplying users, why out of proportion to normal, like 80, and they
>> accelerate real fast, and are useless files too. For a while, this
>> kind was gone, but now their back.
>
>Companies like Media Defender and Media Sentry have a bot which responds to
>search requests for certain titles then floods the network with fake files
>of same.
>
>BTW I'm curently using v3.54 beta 4 which I think is the latest version?
That's the one I've been using since September, about. Still
works fine. Haven't seen any fake file problem whatsoever, so
I'm not sure what other people are seeing.
>(kim)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|