|
|
Posted by Jyeshta on 12/27/07 19:53
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:56:29 -0800, Greg Farr
<gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:24:54 -0000, "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>> BTW I'm curently using v3.54 beta 4 which I think is the latest
>>>> version?
>>>
>>> That's the one I've been using since September, about. Still
>>> works fine. Haven't seen any fake file problem whatsoever, so
>>> I'm not sure what other people are seeing.
>>
>>As I told Greg before, WinMX is not a place I would go looking for movie
>>files. Even if I found one one the chances of it playing back _smoothly_
>>with decent picture and sound quality are remote.
>>
>>(kim)
>
>
>I've also been using v3.54 beta 4 for quite a while now. I don't
>understand why Winmx should not be considered for films, as I've been
>using them for over two yrs and seen tons of them, yes there are some
>that are cam done, and too small, and some bad copies. Lately one
>comes up that says, after you've d/l the whole thing and started it;
>This can only be played on a Dom player, with a URL, and it doesn't
>play. What is best for films, Mule? Please excuse if I ask same thing
>more than once, I had a stroke, and it plays hell with mem.
I use Media Player Classic (free), and for anything that doesn't
open in that, I use VLC Media Player (also free).
>Greg
>http://gregsplace.50megs.com
>http://www.picturetrail.com/fugitive1
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|