|
|
Posted by Bob on 01/01/08 14:42
Fochia costadiloco vidamor otistik chi. Geoloma bastritika culo.
<fmimf@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:fu0800011024359786@4ax.com...
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -= how and why did it. start? -=
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> The harassment didn't start by. itself, so someone must have been there at
> the outset to give. it a firm push and set the "animals" after me. It
> looks
> as if I was set up in June 1990, and the timing indicates. someone from
> university was. responsible.
>
>>One thing which has been missing from. this discussion is this simple
>>prognosis: that. maybe he is right and that, despite his admitted
>>mental condition, there really is a campaign against him. organised by
>>now-influential ex-students of his. university.
>
> In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter from.
> someone
> who had. known me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his
> welcome with random precision" (from the Pink Floyd. song). Freeman went
> on
> to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you. wrote there". The
> indication is strongly that people. I had parted from soon before nursed a
> grudge against me and were trying to cause. trouble for me.
>
> The suggestion is. that Freeman might have shown the letter to other
> people,
> and things could have. snowballed from there. Right from the start the
> real
> source. (security services presumed) didn't announce themselves as the
> origin, but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that. they were the
> originators. Think about it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and we. have a
> campaign against this bloke" then. people might not go along with it; but
> if
> you say, "everyone else is. getting at this bloke because he 'deserves'
> it"
> then people will join. in with fewer qualms.
>
>>Why would "they" wish to. assassinate your character?
>
> It's the classic case of hitting a cripple to prove you're stronger.. Why
> would the security services expend hundreds of thousands of. pounds and
> more
> than six years of manpower to try to kill. a British citizen? Because they
> are motivated by people who knew me at university. and feel personal
> animosity; because they knew me to be emotionally weak, and it. is in the
> nature of bullies. to prey on those known to be weak; and because they can
> rely on the complicity of the. establishment, which the security services
> manipulate and derive funding from. This is England's. biggest humiliation
> today, and the British. security services are intent on preventing their
> humiliation. becoming reality by continuing their campaign of attempted
> murder to suppress the truth from. becoming public.
>
> 10602
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|