Posted by Ron Hunter on 01/21/08 08:32

Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> [A complimentary Cc of this posting was sent to
> Peter D
> <please@.sk>], who wrote in article <13p6sjndnmlji49@corp.supernews.com>:
>> In real life USB maximum transfers peak at about 2/3 of that speed. If you
>> research actual test results, you'll often see speeds max out at 1/3 of the
>> max of 480 Mbps. Becasue USB creates a network where every device "chats'
>> with the central "host" (the computer in most cases) USB 2.0 requires more
>> CPU prcesses than
>
> ... Sorry, but the *technical contents* of this is exactly 0. If you
> know WHY the throughput is not close to the theoretical maximum,
> please explain. If you do not - we all ALREADY know that it is not
> close to the theoretical maximum; do you see any reason to repeat this
> statement again?
>
> Thanks,
> Ilya

He DID. Perhaps you could read it again.

• Next in forum: Re: FA: DARK CITY dvd, DTS CON-AIR, Criterion JASON & ARGONAUTS laserdiscs
• Prev in forum: Re: Bits from Bill: Death to the DVD Disc is Coming
• Thread view: Re: which out of these two cables/ports is best for my miniDV camcorder?

[Reply to this message]