Posted by Richard Crowley on 02/08/07 17:39

"Bill" wrote ...
> I repeat that I don't necessarily think he should not have done it.

There being no legal reaon to prohibit it, why would anyone
think "he should not have done it"? It is not even an issue.

Have you looked up the legal definition of "scenes a faire"
as Ptravel suggested? Your arguments indicate that you
are unfamiliar of the concept.

Here, all you have to do is click and read....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scenes_a_faire
http://www.ivanhoffman.com/scenes.html
http://www.google.com/search?q=scenes+a+faire

[Back to original message]