|
|
Posted by George Hester on 10/11/05 20:01
"db" <@ .> wrote in message
news:434bbb68$0$49804$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
>
> "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hLN2f.38414$7b6.31900@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > "speeder" <no.spam@invalid.com> wrote in message
> > news:bc5mk1dgl4afsb4k7sq8lkl17cesjq38as@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:28:02 GMT, "George Hester"
> >> <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Speeder I really do not care what you think I sound like.
> >>
> >> That's good for you, George because I really don't know what to think
> >> of you at times.
> >>
> >> >Fact is the WinMX
> >> >has performed poorly all day. And getting connected problems is NOT
> >> >what
> > I
> >> >have been saying.
> >>
> >> Not you, George, but maybe others? (hint, hint). With the peer cache
> >> server instability, you can't expect everyone to keep up.
> >>
> >> >There are other issues which you may have addressed as
> >> >Network instability and lack of peers. Of course you could have said
> > that
> >> >at anytime.
> >>
> >> But I did say it, George, please listen instead of trying to make what
> >> I think of you.
> >>
> >> >I have never experienced this level of bullshit in WinMX prior
> >> >to the Big Squeeze. Never. Lack of peers is likely true but then
why?
> >>
> >> Why? Something to do with the "Big Squeeze" maybe?
> >>
> >> >Getting connected is only half the problem.
> >>
> >> Yes! Right on the money you are, George! It's not called peer-to-peer
> >> for nothing.
> >>
> >> Tell ya what. If you still think your problem is due to fake peer
> >> cache servers, you post here their IPs. That way we can all take a
> >> closer look and verify your accusations.
> >
> > Sure I have one. Here:
> >
> > 209.67.209.50
> >
> > That is in the hosts that are coming out of vladd. Why? It doesn't
> > exist.
> >
> > --
> >
> > George Hester
> > _________________________________
>
> Look in your host file.
>
>
>
That's where it came from db.
--
George Hester
_________________________________
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|