|
|
Posted by George Hester on 10/11/05 20:03
"FeMaster" <FeMaster @ hotmail . com> wrote in message
news:hsQ2f.11137$Ue7.3533@fe03.lga...
> It exists... Just went there... This is what is there, at least on port
> 80:
>
> There is no website configured at this address.
>
>
>
> You are seeing this page because there is nothing configured for the site
> you have requested. If you think you are seeing this page in error, please
> contact the site administrator or datacenter responsible for this site.
>
> About cPanel:
>
>
> cPanel is a leading provider of software for the webhosting industry. If
you
> would like to learn more about cPanel please visit our website at
> http://www.cpanel.net/. Please be advised that cPanel is not a webhosting
> company itself, and as such is not responsible for content found elsewhere
> on this site.
>
> So, it DOES exists, just not as a "webpage"...
>
>
> "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hLN2f.38414$7b6.31900@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > "speeder" <no.spam@invalid.com> wrote in message
> > news:bc5mk1dgl4afsb4k7sq8lkl17cesjq38as@4ax.com...
> > > On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:28:02 GMT, "George Hester"
> > > <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Speeder I really do not care what you think I sound like.
> > >
> > > That's good for you, George because I really don't know what to think
> > > of you at times.
> > >
> > > >Fact is the WinMX
> > > >has performed poorly all day. And getting connected problems is NOT
> what
> > I
> > > >have been saying.
> > >
> > > Not you, George, but maybe others? (hint, hint). With the peer cache
> > > server instability, you can't expect everyone to keep up.
> > >
> > > >There are other issues which you may have addressed as
> > > >Network instability and lack of peers. Of course you could have said
> > that
> > > >at anytime.
> > >
> > > But I did say it, George, please listen instead of trying to make what
> > > I think of you.
> > >
> > > >I have never experienced this level of bullshit in WinMX prior
> > > >to the Big Squeeze. Never. Lack of peers is likely true but then
why?
> > >
> > > Why? Something to do with the "Big Squeeze" maybe?
> > >
> > > >Getting connected is only half the problem.
> > >
> > > Yes! Right on the money you are, George! It's not called peer-to-peer
> > > for nothing.
> > >
> > > Tell ya what. If you still think your problem is due to fake peer
> > > cache servers, you post here their IPs. That way we can all take a
> > > closer look and verify your accusations.
> >
> > Sure I have one. Here:
> >
> > 209.67.209.50
> >
> > That is in the hosts that are coming out of vladd. Why? It doesn't
> exist.
> >
> > --
> >
> > George Hester
> > _________________________________
> >
>
>
I never said the fake Peer Cache Servers were Web pages I said they were
fake Peer Cache Servers.
--
George Hester
_________________________________
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|