|
|
Posted by Jesse on 09/28/56 11:39
NRen2k5 <napsterneorenegade@hotmail.com> wrote in news:8vBGf.14628
$CM1.221541@wagner.videotron.net:
> Jesse wrote:
>> CQ <me@privacy.net> wrote in
>> news:1124880793.9ffeaaf804fc7e56e0e569c39cfa9bc9@bubbanews:
>>
>>
>>>In article <430c5b05$1@news.broadpark.no>, P.K. said...
>>>
>>>
>>>>What program should I use to convert audio cd's to mp3, and I would
>>>>also like to get the name and info of the songs unto the mp3's. I can
>>>>do this with my Windows media player program, but then I don't get mp3
>>>>files... When I try with Winamp, I don't get the name info. What size
>>>>should I use, 192 or 256 kbps?
>>>
>>>I don't use it to rip but Winamp will lookup name info for CDs so I'm
>>>pretty sure you can configure it to do the same for ripping.
>>>
>>>If you can't get it to do what you want you might try a small free
>>>utility called CDex. It's very easy to set up and use.
>>>
>>>http://cdexos.sourceforge.net/
>>>
>>>As far as the 192 vs 256 goes, you should listen and decide for
>>>yourself. Many people think 192Kbps is almost transparent and that
>>>256Kbps is overkill and just makes the files too large. In the end it
>>>depends on whether quality is more important than file size (to YOU) and
>>>whether you are going to listen to the mp3s in a listening environment
>>>where you would actually be able to discern any difference in quality
>>>anyway.
>>>
>>>BTW, the best trade-off of file size/quality is obtained by using VBR
>>>and setting your program to use one of the Lame presets, but that is a
>>>whole different issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> CQ, your a walking copyright violation, not to mention a bonafide ball
>> sucking maggot, so hows about you just shut the fuck up ?
>
> Jessie, you walking assrape waiting to happen, we're talking about
> copying your own CD's, which is perfectly legal you fucking idiot.
>
> - NRen2k5
If I need any lip from you, you dumb ass canaduhnadian, I'll ask for it.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|