|
|
Posted by Ty Ford on 10/27/73 11:33
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:20:39 -0500, Nappy wrote
(in article <X3mjf.28327$Zv5.27726@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>):
>
> "Specs" <No.Spam@Thanks.com> wrote in message
> news:438d6875$0$63067$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
>> Interested to read your definition of HD.
>
>
> 1920x1080 4:4:4 10 bit
>
> HDV does not even come close. Not even nearly close.
>
> And I didn't even mention the audio.
>
> But Specs.. I wouldn't think this discussion would be necessary. Are there
> really folks out there who think HDV is HD?
Yes, I run into that all the time. It's amazing how much lack of
understanding or denial exists when the marketing departments get involved
and the prices drop into the area where almost anyone can afford the gear.
The stuff I see on the air, the blocking and artifacts. When an AUDIO guy
like me can see them, they really can't be denied.
Regards,
Ty
-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|