|
|
Posted by Smarty on 10/06/42 11:34
Here's a good link to compare the two cameras:
http://www.sonyhdvinfo.com/article.php?filename=Comparison-between-HDR-HC1-and-HDR-FX1
Smarty
"Smarty" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message
news:B7udnQHMtvgzgADeRVn-ig@adelphia.com...
>I own the FX1 and have only briefly used the HC1,
>
> The FX1 is a 3 CCD camera, resulting in significantly better low light
> performance, and resulting improvements in shadow detail. The lens on the
> FX1 is ***NOT*** removable (nor is the lens on the cheaper HC1). Both have
> the same storage capacity and record at the same HDV resolution. There are
> numerous other differences of less importance.
>
> Physically the FX1 is considerably larger, bulkier, heavier, etc. and
> sports a more versatile lens.
>
> Smarty
>
>
> "Will" <westes-usc@noemail.nospam> wrote in message
> news:5cednRuEk6S5kgDeRVn-og@giganews.com...
>> Can someone summarize key differences between the entry-level Sony HDTV
>> camcorder, model HDR-HC1 and the higher end professional model HDR-FX1?
>> The FX1 has removable lenses, but what about the native resolution,
>> storage
>> capacity, etc? We would be using this to make instructional videos for
>> operating on complex machinery. The production values would not need to
>> be
>> extremely high, but we do need the highest possible resolution, and at
>> least
>> decent rendering of detail in shadow areas. Both cameras seem to sport
>> 1080i horizontal lines.
>>
>> --
>> Will
>>
>>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|