|
|
Posted by Toby on 01/24/06 02:02
"Richard Crowley" <richard.7.crowley@intel.com> wrote in message
news:dr37b3$noo$1@news01.intel.com...
> "Steve King" wrote ...
>> "Richard Crowley" wrote ...
>>> Yes, you will end up "eyeballing" the video. Pick one or the other
>>> camera as the "reference" and adjust the picture from the other
>>> one to match as best you can. You might find that one of the
>>> cameras made better video than the other, i.e. one which gives
>>> you more to work with.
>>
>> On the other hand, you may have to 'degrade' (whatever that
>> means;-) one camera to match the other...
>
> Yes, that is what I meant, but neglected to say explicity.
> Thanks for the fumble recovery. :-)
You can dig yourself into a hole if you are not careful, but remember that
the most important thing is to eyeball-match transitions. It might (or might
not) be helpful to batch-correct one or the other camera as a starting
point, but the important thing is to make the shot transitions as seamless
as possible, so they should be at least tweaked individually.
The hole gets dug when you start progressively increasing some value, like
color saturation, and after a little while you go way overboard and have to
back up and redo a number of previous shots, so it is good to check earlier
in the video every couple of corrections to make sure that your values are
not increasing or decreasing radically, although the only thing that matters
in the end is how closely you match the transitions.
Toby
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|