|
|
Posted by TonyP on 10/05/13 11:38
doc wrote:
> it was nonetheless Avid and that says a lot, huh?
>
> dr d
>
> "Teeafit" <teeafit@teeafit.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1138537738.167863.3840@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>>If I can just cut across this tedious "nyaah, nyaah" exchange and make
>>a tongue-in-cheek observation, I've just spent 2 days directing an edit
>>at the studios of one of our regional broadcasters. The premises are
>>new, with a state-of-the-art networked editing scheme from Avid. It
>>must have cost squillions!
>>
>>And apparently it falls over just as regularly as LE6.1! Little
>>things, like from time to time being unable to do a freeze frame of
>>longer than 1 second, or realising that a 'sluggishness' is creeping
>>into the workflow that best dictates regular saves until a re-boot can
>>be done (not always possible when a news broadcast is coming up in a
>>couple of minutes).
>>
>>The operator was quite sanguine about it -- "It's a computer, what more
>>can you say?!"
It depends on the frequency of the problems. I know that I save often no
matter what program I am using. The only program (video) that I had
really no problems at all was the original Amiga Video Toaster.
To expect problem free programs with todays bloatware and many different
combination of hardware is asking a lot. With tons of coding, what can
you say?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|