|
|
Posted by Johan Stck on 01/31/06 13:29
Martin Heffels wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:41:52 +0100, Johan Stäck <johan@stack.se> wrote:
>
>
>>So, at least parts of the film has been transferred to digital, then
>>processed, and re-transferred to film.
>
>
> Not necesarily actually, because you can do this optical as well. And that
> only works with frame-duplication.
>
>
>>And, if your description is true(and I have no reason to doubt it), I
>>think they did a lousy job at producing intermediary frames.
>
>
> Ah well, you can see quite often that the slow-motions are an afterthought,
> at least, the ones done cheaply.
>
>
>>The opening scene clearly shows two tennisballs seemingly glued together
>>passing over the net...
>
>
> You were probably one of the very few people who noticed this, and was
> annoyed by it. Not a percentage big enough for the filmmakers to worry
> about and do it properly :)
I would'nt say "annoyed".
Agreed, most people neither notice nor care, but having worked so much
with digital video and interlace (using it to my advantage) I was
alerted and puzzled.
However, I much liked the film, even though it was a true tragedy.
I have a weak spot for Woody Allen, I must confess..
/Johan
>
> cheers
>
> -martin-
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|