|
|
Posted by David McCall on 01/31/06 15:48
"Martin Heffels" <mitch.mcNeilljn@sprint.ca> wrote in message
news:tjbut1pt010m1kc40p5tcpo260ffa5t1lu@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:49:04 GMT, "David McCall"
> <david.mccall@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Good point, but sometimes aren't there takes that have no value?
>>Not even for the out take reel :-)
>
> Well, sometimes there are like when you start rolling and something
> immediately happens where you would call cut. Like a sound-person who has
> been asleep, and only notices that batteries are flat when you roll the
> camera, or an airplane or another loud sound interfering. That's where I
> never seem to find anything for the edit. Although if you have a nice
> reaction of the talent, it would be something nice again for the out-take
> reel. But this is my way of working and doesn't necessarily stroke with
> your's :)
>
No doubt about it, it is safer to just keep it all.
I think the difference is that I've worked on very little long-form,
If you were shooting a spot, you could likely do the whole thing
on just 1 P2 card.
It may not matter though, perhaps it is not such a cool
camera after all. My only experience was seeing all 3 at a
small trade show and the Panasonic looked cleaner to me,
and I liked the idea of the P2 cards and the versatility of
the camera. We will have to see how it plays out.
David
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|