|
|
Posted by kaboom on 10/29/05 21:28
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:26:12 -0400, Stan Brown
<the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
<snipped dairy references>
>The "one significant area" you mention is the whole point. When
>something is crossposted, people with decent newsreaders see it once;
>when it's multiposted, people see it multiple times.
**No, the whole point is whether or not the post was completely
off-topic in both NGs and their respective communities. You just
happen to be sinking your teeth into crossposting because your
argument for being completely off topic and of no interest to the 2
groups is far weaker and practically non-existent than the rampant
multiposting of...2 posts. Congratulations on generating more
off-topic posts than my original post could have ever hoped to
achieve.
>And in this case, the clueless luser compounded it by multiposting to
>groups where it wasn't even on topic.
**An announcement that these movies are going to turn up on TV so
catch them because 2 of them might not be coming out on DVD as was
planned is hardly off topic. Your original complaint was, for the most
part, irrelevant. As to the 'infraction' of multiposting, it was so
incredibly insignificant as to barely warrant any type of reply.
kaboomie
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|