|
|
Posted by Dragon on 10/17/69 11:40
"Gunther Gloop" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:4606hrF8ko0vU1@individual.net...
> POD {ҿ} wrote:
>> "Dragon" <davewhitnospam@blueyonder.co.uk> once tried to test me. I
>> ate their liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti
>>
>>> Any advice on which one please guys special edition or directors cut,
>>> i know Dc should be but rewind say Theatrical version for original
>>> sound
>>>
>>> cheers dave
>>>
>>
>> 3 disc directors cut, hands down
>
> Hands down? Why?
>
> I have the 2-disc R1 ("Special Edition" it says). I loved the movie. I
> watched a lot of the extras (good, but nothing overly-great). The deleted
> scenes on that release all seemed over-long and pointless. I would worry
> that if they were reinserted into the movie it would cause it to begin to
> drag. It's slow enough as it is (and I enjoyed that), but a little more
> could tip it over into 'boringness'.
>
> I haven't seen the Director's Cut and I don't know if the (deleted) scenes
> mentioned above are the ones that cause it to be different to the
> 'theatrical release'.
> So that's why I'm asking... Why the Director's Cut? And why 3-discs?
>
> -Kevin.
>
>
what about the 2 disc region 2 UK is that worth getting
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|