|
|
Posted by mv on 02/24/06 17:07
Your main problem Doc is that you clearly don't know what you are
talking about. It seems almost troll like the way you came on this forum
with loads of questions about what camera and formats you should get,
for what if I member rightly was a somewhat reactionary religious
organisation, the answers to which you then perversely rejected with
stunningly shallow analysis. You now seek to reassure yourself , in the
face of so much genuinely expert advice, that buying consumer standard
definition DV was a good move for your church's local TV aspirations.
Sorry Doc but you still made the wrong decision and you still have no
idea how HDV and HD formats are being deployed in the real world of
network television and serious broadcast applications. Your half baked
and somewhat eccentric theories concerning anything you've shared with
us so far to do with television, film and video are really too tedious
to debate. But just for the record you don't have SD 16x9. You have
ersatz 16x9 which even at it's best true anamorphic ratio, uses 4x3
CCD's that cut the top and bottom off the picture and stretch the
remaining image into a 16x9 picture, resulting in a huge 25% reduction
to what's already a low resolution picture. But then I told you all this
before you made your purchase.
I doubt you are in touch with producers or broadcasters that work beyond
the most parochial TV level, because those still in the SD 4x3 domain,
with the exception of a few residual 4x3 Beta SP and Digital Betacam
type applications, are clearly not involved in major TV broadcast
production, as such one shouldn't take their cases for a generality.
--
John Lubran
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|