You are here: Re: Square Pixels vs 0.9 DV pixels « Video Production « DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Re: Square Pixels vs 0.9 DV pixels

Posted by Richard Crowley on 10/27/72 11:42

"huckfin1" <admere@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1142524083.643245.187940@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone help me with this dilema,
>
>
> I am assembling a documentary which will include many DV-AVI clips
> that
>
> use a 0.9 pixel aspect ratio and many many stills which use square
> pixels.
>
>
> In Premiere 6.0, if your project is set to DV 0.9 pixel aspect ratio,
> you need to render the work area each time you add a still image to
> the timeline. This is rather rediculous and very time consuming and I
> understand not necessary in other programs like Final Cut Pro.
>
>
> The dilema is that I will be working with perhaps as many as 50 video
> clips that are in DV-AVI 0.9 format and I also am using perhaps as
> many
>
> as 100 still images so I'm beat. It seems that I would either have to
> re-export the videos to AVI and square pixels then set the project to
> square pixels or live with the rendering problem of still images. I
> have been told that I should keep the videos in their current DV state
> in order to maintain the highest quality.
>
>
> Does anyone have an answer to this problem?

I've been importing stills for years without even giving it
a second thought. If this concerns you, why not just batch
convert all your stills to 0.9 pixels and drop them in as
native "NTSC aspect".

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"