Posted by Mike Walsh on 10/05/54 11:44

Although component video is theoretically better than S-Video you probably won't see any difference. Many people seem to be oblivious to poor resolution and NTSC artifacts and can't even tell the difference between composite video and S-Video.
Interlacing reduces flicker at relatively low frame rates e.g. broadcast at 30 frames per second and increases brightness on a CRT. Non-interlaced video does not have these problems if the frame rate is high enough.

Paul L wrote:
>
> Isn't S-video output good enough for current DVD's? Why component
> progressive scan?

--
Mike Walsh
West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.A.

• Next in forum: Re: who makes CompUSA external burners?
• Prev in forum: Re: If current DVD's are not in HD, why does one need progressive scan output?
• Thread view: Re: If current DVD's are not in HD, why does one need progressive scanoutput?

[Reply to this message]