|
|
Posted by Richard C. on 06/09/06 15:18
X-No-archive: yes
"Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:slrne8h15h.shr.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
> Richard C. wrote on [Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:35:46 -0700]:
>> X-No-archive: yes
>>
>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>> news:slrne8gp7s.shr.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>>> Richard C. wrote on [Thu, 8 Jun 2006 07:45:14 -0700]:
>>>> X-No-archive: yes
>>>>
>>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:slrne8dr1e.l2a.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>>>>> Richard C. wrote on [Wed, 7 Jun 2006 07:12:25 -0700]:
>>>>>> X-No-archive: yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:slrne8chsb.h76.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>>>>>>> west488@yahoo.com wrote on [6 Jun 2006 19:59:11 -0700]:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> YAHOO AUCTIONS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fix your sig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===========================
>>>>>> Fix your eyes.
>>>>>> His sig works just fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> The sig quoted above was not just fine. If you don't know what you're
>>>>> talking about shut up
>>>>
>>>> ==============================
>>>> I know exactly what I am talking about.
>>>> It looks fine. That is a fact and the truth.
>>>> If it looks "wrong" to you, tough shit!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Talking out of your arse again.
>>>
>>> The sig delimeter was 66% incorrect. It was just [--] instead of [-- ]
>>>
>>> Now, go prove you're a moron elsewhere.
>>
>> =============================
>> That merely demonstrates that you are way too anal!
>
> Or that perhaps, with the standards in place, newsreaders are able to
> differentiate between content and signature. Imagine that. With
> different colours and everything.
======================
OH BOY! Colors and everything!
Wow! What a deal!
Sorry, but I read text.........................
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|