|
|
Posted by Jim on 06/12/06 10:57
In article <Wqbjg.12177$U84.226193@wagner.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 wrote:
> Jim wrote:
>> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 70% thanks to unfair business practice as I have already explained a
>>> dozen times. You have nothing new to say so get the fuck out, fat man.
>>
>> You haven't "explained" a damn thing.
>
> I have explained plenty. You refuse to believe any of it.
No, you've ranted about how it's "not fair" but you don't seem to
be able to back it up with *facts*.
>> Simply repeating the same false
>> statement again and again and again won't make it true.
>
> So then stop it, for fuck's sake.
Didn't see any facts in your reply there. Noted.
>
>> So let's try one more time shall we? What are these "unfair business
>> practices" of which you speak? Hint: making iPod and iTMS work
>> exclusively (for the most part) with each other isn't an unfair business
>> practice.
>
> Yes, it is. It's like Ford making a card that only runs on fuel refined
> by Ford, or Bic making pens that only write on paper made by Bic.
Neither of which would be illegal providing they didn't hide the fact that
there are some conditions of use.
Microsoft *choose* to license their DRM. Apple choose not to. Both are fair.
Both are legal. Get over it.
Jim
--
Find me at http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk
JediGeeks http://www.jedigeeks.com
"Ah, gentle dames, it gars me greet, To think how monie councels sweet,
How monie lengthen'd, sage advices, The Husband frae the wife despises!"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|