|
|
Posted by Stephen Adams on 09/30/05 11:50
NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> writes:
>Jim wrote:
>> In article <vswkg.33162$jb.212367@wagner.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 wrote:
>>>> Still, I, and many others, want to know how the various online music
>>>> stores and player manufacturers are breaking the law.
>>> Apple. Not "various online music stores and player manufacturers". *Apple*.
>>>
>>
>> Apple are not breaking the law. If you can prove otherwise then do so,
>> otherwise it remains your *opinion* that Apple are doing something illegal.
>
>And it is your opinion that they are not breaking the law. Until you can
>prove so, that is *your* opinion.
Actually, no. You asserted that they are breaking the law. It's up to
YOU to prove your assertion, or at least supply sufficient evidence that
what you say is actually the case.
The assumption, at least in the American system, is that you are NOT
violating the law, and are innocent until such time as you are proved
to be guilty. You don't have to prove your innocence - it's simply
assumed.
-Stephen
--
Space Age Cybernomad Stephen Adams
malchus842SP@AMgmail.com (remove SPAM to reply)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|