|
|
Posted by Stephen Adams on 10/16/05 11:50
Jim <jim@magrathea.plus.com> writes:
>In article <pgykg.17692$Ra3.178580@weber.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 wrote:
>>>>> Still, I, and many others, want to know how the various online music
>>>>> stores and player manufacturers are breaking the law.
>>>> Apple. Not "various online music stores and player manufacturers". *Apple*.
>>>
>>> Apple are not breaking the law. If you can prove otherwise then do so,
>>> otherwise it remains your *opinion* that Apple are doing something illegal.
>>
>> And it is your opinion that they are not breaking the law. Until you can
>> prove so, that is *your* opinion.
>
>Oh, stop evading. You can't prove they're doing anything illegal. I, on the
>other hand, don't *have* to prove that they're not. That's just how it works.
He's grasping at straws. He wants everyone in the world to validate HIS
choice of media player and HIS opinion of the various music stores and
formats. Because we refuse to do this, he's throwing out scatter-shot
accusations against Apple.
It seems, as I noted before, that to him the size of his manhood depends
directly on global validation of his choice of media players.
Sad, really.
-Stephen
--
Space Age Cybernomad Stephen Adams
malchus842SP@AMgmail.com (remove SPAM to reply)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|