|
|
Posted by GMAN on 06/19/06 18:50
In article <rqab92ptepv2c82aqijvsu7avc2kjgcm19@4ax.com>, Roy L. Fuchs <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 06:05:19 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>
>>On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:44:57 -0400, Joshua Zyber wrote:
>>
>>> "asj" <kalim1998@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> They can't even get 50 GB discs to work right. This argument is a red
>>> herring anyway. Even if these theoretical 200 GB discs could be made to
>>> work in a lab, the players themselves are limited to only dual-layer 50
>>> GB playback.
>>>
>>>> and it is backed by a lot more
>>>> studios (therefore, much more content available) and
>>>> manufacturers....
>>>
>>> Maybe true today. Let's check back in a year, shall we?
>>
>>I'm sorry, but that statement invalidates a lot of your own arguments.
>>Problems producing dual-layer Blu-Ray discs? Check back in a year. The
>>price of Blu-Ray players? Check back in a year. The number of titles
>>available? Check back in a year.
>>
>>Basically, any problem you have with Blu-Ray *now* is invalid because you
>>don't know what the situation will be like a year from now.
>>
>
>
> Hahahahaa... You're funny. Yes, I do.
>
> There will have been several hundred thousand HD discs sold, and
>several tens of thousands of players sold.
>
> The fact is that YOU are the twit that doesn't know where things are
>going.
There will be more Blu Ray players sold on day one of Playstation 3's release
than there will have been from the entire couple of months that HD-DVD has been
out.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|