|
|
Posted by AZ Nomad on 06/19/06 19:13
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:50:29 GMT, GMAN <Not@home.now> wrote:
>In article <rqab92ptepv2c82aqijvsu7avc2kjgcm19@4ax.com>, Roy L. Fuchs <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>>On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 06:05:19 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>>On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:44:57 -0400, Joshua Zyber wrote:
>>>
>>>> "asj" <kalim1998@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> They can't even get 50 GB discs to work right. This argument is a red
>>>> herring anyway. Even if these theoretical 200 GB discs could be made to
>>>> work in a lab, the players themselves are limited to only dual-layer 50
>>>> GB playback.
>>>>
>>>>> and it is backed by a lot more
>>>>> studios (therefore, much more content available) and
>>>>> manufacturers....
>>>>
>>>> Maybe true today. Let's check back in a year, shall we?
>>>
>>>I'm sorry, but that statement invalidates a lot of your own arguments.
>>>Problems producing dual-layer Blu-Ray discs? Check back in a year. The
>>>price of Blu-Ray players? Check back in a year. The number of titles
>>>available? Check back in a year.
>>>
>>>Basically, any problem you have with Blu-Ray *now* is invalid because you
>>>don't know what the situation will be like a year from now.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hahahahaa... You're funny. Yes, I do.
>>
>> There will have been several hundred thousand HD discs sold, and
>>several tens of thousands of players sold.
>>
>> The fact is that YOU are the twit that doesn't know where things are
>>going.
>There will be more Blu Ray players sold on day one of Playstation 3's release
>than there will have been from the entire couple of months that HD-DVD has been
>out.
Yeah, if they get enough of them out there should be at last ten that still
work at any given moment.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|