|
Posted by Babaganoosh on 06/25/06 05:03
In article <UqidnSOiUKjz5gDZnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@comcast.com>,
<normanstrong@comcast.net> wrote:
> What you have described is a serious drawback from the point of view of the
> manufacturers. I doubt that any company will do what you suggest--put more
> time on the disc. Time is what they're selling. A single HD DVD with 4
> times as much program material will have to sell for as much as 4 DVDs.
So therefore it would be to their advantage anyway to put more content
on a disc.
Let's say that a company is planning to release a season set of a given
show. Wouldn't it actually be cheaper to use BluRay or HD-DVD to put the
entire season on one disc, since using standard def DVD would mean using
more discs?
They're not selling a specific number of discs. They're selling *a
season set*. It would be to their advantage to use as few discs as
possible - cheaper for them, and more convenient for the customer.
--
"Drop the One Ring! Drop it NOW!"
- Jack Bauer in 'Lord of the Rings'
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|