|
|
Posted by Gunther Gloop on 09/26/06 12:51
mmaker@my-deja.com wrote:
> Gunther Gloop wrote:
>> On reading further about this, I've come to the conclusion that you
>> don't know what you are talking about...
>
> Well, that's always good to know. Considering I've been working with
> HD video on a regular basis for a couple of years, and all.
>
>> The Panasonic AE700 (which we were using with this player) takes the
>> 1080i signal, de-interlaces this back to 1080p, then scales it down
>> to 720p for display on its panel (this is the native res for this
>> pj).
>
> Um, hello? As I said, in most cases it deinterlaces the 1080i footage
> by throwing away 540 lines of video. I can't confirm that's true of
> that specific projector, but your own words imply that it is: you
> can't display interlaced footage on a progressive-scan display without
> deinterlacing unless you want it to look like crap... and most
> deinterlacers just throw one field away completely rather than try to
> figure out which parts haven't changed enough to be a problem.
>
>> Again, there is no doubt that the image will be improved with a
>> 'pure' 1080 signal -but I wouldn't expect it to be a "I've seen the
>> error of my ways" moment.
>
> Film footage at 1080 has more than twice as many pixels as 720. You
> don't think that will make a significant difference to picture
> quality?
>
> But hey, ignore me: I don't know what I'm talking about.
>
Ok.
-Kevin.
--
Email replies to: news1@SPAMBEGONEkevinforde.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|