|
|
Posted by Clem Dye on 10/13/06 11:31
nev wrote:
>
>
> On 12/10/06 17:58, in article 452E7542.6050006@me.com, "Clem Dye"
> <bite@me.com> wrote:
>
>> Whilst having a rummage through my DVD collection recently, I came
>> across both the standard and Director's Cut releases of Lock, Stock and
>> Two Smoking Barrels. Quite why I have both versions eludes me at
>> present. Anyway, I've watched both of them, though not recently, but I
>> can't recall what was so special about the Director's Cut release.
>> Anyone got any ideas? Other than the fact that the Director's Cut is
>> longer I can't recall anything about it, but both DVDCompare and
>> MichaelDVD reckon the Director's Cut is better, but without saying why.
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>> Clem
>
>
> I'd disagree with them. I bought the standard edition after having loved the
> film at the cinema. I then bought the directors cut and when I watched it I
> could see why all the added (extra) scenes were cut originally. They added
> nothing to the story and/or were scenes not up to standard.
>
> I subsequently off-ed the directors cut and have kept the original. Saying
> that I haven't had the courage to see Ritchie's last effort after my mate
> said he'd be embarrassed to lend it to me.......
>
> Nev
>
Thanks Nev. The fact that the DC didn't stick in my mind has confirmed
that I'll junk my DC version too.
Ta
Clem
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|