|
|
Posted by Nige on 10/13/06 11:33
"Clem Dye" <bite@me.com> wrote in message
news:uOKXg.12888$Or2.6123@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
> nev wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/10/06 17:58, in article 452E7542.6050006@me.com, "Clem Dye"
>> <bite@me.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Whilst having a rummage through my DVD collection recently, I came
>>> across both the standard and Director's Cut releases of Lock, Stock and
>>> Two Smoking Barrels. Quite why I have both versions eludes me at
>>> present. Anyway, I've watched both of them, though not recently, but I
>>> can't recall what was so special about the Director's Cut release.
>>> Anyone got any ideas? Other than the fact that the Director's Cut is
>>> longer I can't recall anything about it, but both DVDCompare and
>>> MichaelDVD reckon the Director's Cut is better, but without saying why.
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>>
>>> Clem
>>
>>
>> I'd disagree with them. I bought the standard edition after having loved
>> the
>> film at the cinema. I then bought the directors cut and when I watched it
>> I
>> could see why all the added (extra) scenes were cut originally. They
>> added
>> nothing to the story and/or were scenes not up to standard.
>>
>> I subsequently off-ed the directors cut and have kept the original.
>> Saying
>> that I haven't had the courage to see Ritchie's last effort after my mate
>> said he'd be embarrassed to lend it to me.......
>>
>> Nev
>>
> Thanks Nev. The fact that the DC didn't stick in my mind has confirmed
> that I'll junk my DC version too.
>
> Ta
>
>
> Clem
>
I'll buy it for a dollar, been after it for a bit
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|