Posted by Bill on 12/06/06 19:37

Actually, I thought you said that you didn't think any copyright owner
ever benefitted from copyright infringement. I think I read that twice,
carefully, but if I am mistaken, pardon me.


PTravel wrote:
> "Bill" <trash@christian-horizons.org> wrote in message
> news:lN6dnSQ0lM3BT-vYnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@golden.net...
>
>>Does everyone forget that The Grateful Dead actually encouraged people to
>>tape their concerts?
>
>
> What has that to do with this discussion?
>
>
>>So... were they stupid? Did they lose a lot of money? Did they go broke
>>because nobody wanted to buy their recordings any more?
>
>
> No. What has that to do with this discussion?
>
>
>
>>If what most posters here said here was true, that should absolutely have
>>been the case.
>
>
> I haven't seen any discussion in this thread about the economic effects of
> non-enforcement of copyright.

• Next in forum: Re: Youtube copyright infringements are not all bad for the copyright holders?
• Prev in forum: Re: Christina Aguilera at Rockefeller Tree Lighting sung live?
• Thread view: Re: Youtube copyright infringements are not all bad for the copyright holders?

[Reply to this message]