You are here: Re: SD or HD? Interlaced or Progressive? « Video Production « DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Re: SD or HD? Interlaced or Progressive?

Posted by Spex on 01/11/07 11:22

azl3chn3rs@gmail.com wrote:
> Mike Kujbida wrote:
>> B&H lists it for $3,700.00 so make sure the place giving you that price is
>> reputable.
>> http://www.resellerratings.com/ is the first place I check if the price
>> seems too good to be true as there are a lot of scammers out there.
>> Forewarned is forearmed.
>>
>> Mike
>
> Thanks for the tip Mike. I thought that the price was probably more
> than low $3k's. But it looks like a decent camera though.
>
> I'm still on the fence regarding HD versus SD. I guess it really boils
> down to a personal choice and there is no concensus on which way to go.

Of course there is. Why purchase a SD only camera when a high quality
HD camera that also does SD is available?

There is no future-proofing in media industry but being able to get an
extra year out of an investment can pay dividends. You'll get more use
out of a HDV camera than buying into DV at the end of the wave. Your
business plan may show otherwise though.

Oh, if the price is unbelievable it usually is unbelievable. The
margins on these cameras have been cut to the bone so there isn't much
left for the dealer to cut so you won't find too much price variation
from reputable sellers.

Also check out the Sony HVR-V1 as in my opinion the picture quality is
superior to the Canon.

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"