|
|
Posted by getrich on 01/18/07 21:51
asjbiotek@gmail.com wrote:
> Dub wrote:
> > asjbiotek@gmail.com wrote:
> > > PLus, you never addressed my point that Sony is only ONE player in
> > > Blu-ray - the others are actusally much larger than it, like Samsung.
> >
> > You never addressed ANY of Jordan's points, which made you look foolish
> > in just about every way imaginable. Ergo, Usenet can chalk you up as
> > another net.k00k with more bandwidth than common sense.
>
> really? What point would that be? We're talking blu-ray here.....Both
> MIcrosoft and Sony lose money on game console hardware, which they make
> up for in $59 software...what's your point?
>
> Did samsung, Philips, Panasonic, etc suddenly go into the game console
> business?
Yeah, GAMES ON THEIR SYSTEMS. So you can ya ya ya ya ya all you like
about this BluRay cheerleading. Sony doesn't get a cut of movies made,
certainly not like games. So if BluRay succeeds and people don't buy
games for the PS3, the success of BluRay buries Sony particularly if
people buy it to watch movies. Well, maybe then dedicated BluRay only
players will get cheaper than the PS3, and therefore, prove to make the
PS3 not sold to watch BluRay movies.
In the mean time, Microsoft holds even with Sony, they bleed less red
ink, or make a profit in fact, and Sony loses, and is dead and buried.
Maybe in your world an increase in sales of items that are a loss per
sale makes a profit. But in reality here, it means you go broke.
- The Rich
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|