|
|
Posted by Smarty on 02/14/07 23:40
In the past, I have been able to find samples of the Sanyo "HD" video on the
web, and have downloaded quite a few of them. I presume the newer, improved
model will (and may already) have samples demonstrating its' performance.
The Sanyo previously released looked pretty weak IMHO. Given the size,
price, target market, etc. I would say that it filled a definite niche, but
it unquestionably was vastly behind any HDV content I have seen, even in
bright daylight with little motion in the scene. Perhaps the newer one is a
leap forward (but perhaps not.....)
Even Sony, with their powerful engineering talents, makes mpeg4 look pretty
disappointing in AVCHD. The reviews of these cameras as well as those of the
Sanyo have been quite scathing.
Smarty
"Gene E. Bloch" <spamfree@nobody.invalid> wrote in message
news:mn.73627d723d34a7ad.1980@nobody.invalid...
> On 2/14/2007, PTravel posted this:
>> "Gene" <genes@wildblue.net> wrote in message
>> news:y4IAh.17$AO3.28701@news.sisna.com...
>>> My gut feeling is that you are correct.
>>>
>>> However, I really would like to see the two
>>> DVDs I described burned & played side-by-side.
>
> [...]
>>
>> With all that said, if you're still interested in the Sanyo, I'd suggest
>> trying it hands on in a store that will output the video to a decent
>> monitor (don't rely on the camera's lcd or viewfinder).
>
> Suggestion: go to the store with your own SD card, & if they let you,
> record on it - both indoors and out if possible - and take it back home to
> look at it at your leisure and with other stuff of your own to compare it
> to.
>
> [...]
>
> I own an earlier model of the Sanyo. I found its video satisfactory (not
> superb!), but I found the camera hard to use. The menus were a bit
> confusing to me, and the odd shape made it hard for me to aim it easily.
>
> I have taken videos with a Casio minicamera that also takes mpeg-4 video.
> I found its video a bit better (surprisingly good, but still not superb),
> and I found it easier to handle.
>
> It goes without saying that YYMV (said he, saying it anyway).
>
> Before pushing the send button, I thought a bit about better words to
> describe the video quality of the two cameras. I decided on "adequate" and
> "surprisingly adequate", respectively :-)
>
> --
> Gene E. Bloch (Gino)
> letters617blochg3251
> (replace the numbers by "at" and "dotcom")
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|