|
|
Posted by st.lucky on 04/08/07 21:40
I thanks you for your advice. Now I am becaming anxious because I
don't know what I have to do precisely. ;)
I will make HDV editing only. In your opinion is it better to put one
HD only or two HDs with RAID0?
Thanks again
>"provides improved performance and additional storage
>but no fault tolerance from disk errors or disk failure. Any
>disk failure destroys the array, and is twice as likely to fail."
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#Standard_RAID_levels
>
>Unless you are doing HD video, "improved performance"
>is of no benefit that I can percieve. Any modern hard drive
>is more than fast enough to keep up with DV video.
>
>It creates no "additional storage" above what two separate
>drives would provide. And in many cases you are better off
>with two separate (if smaller) drives than a single larger drive.
>Particularly for rendering and other operations where data is
>beinng processed from a source file to a destination file. I see
>better performance when I can put the two files on separate
>physical drives.
>
>OTOH, "twice as likely to fail" is a big negative indicator to
>me. YMMV.
>
>> Do you use Canopus Edius?
>
>No, but I fail to see why that is relevant. If you are looking
>specifically for Canopus Editus users, you should likely look
>for some forum dedicated to that application. This newsgroup
>is a collection of users of all the different NLE systems.
>
>> Can you tell me if can I use a middle tower or it is better
>> a tower?
>
>I agree with Mr. Kujbida. Use the larger case because it
>will be more flexible, and will likely run cooler.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|