|
Posted by nappy on 04/13/07 15:07
<mmaker@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1176468217.939073.278790@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 12, 6:44 pm, "nappy" <s...@spam.com> wrote:
>> there is a 16% speed diff. between the 2 memories.
>
> But if the CPU is having to access RAM, it's already screwed because
> the latency of memory accesses is large no matter how fast they run.
WHAT?
> The actual performance difference for applications will be much less
> than 16%.
point was made
>
> Mark
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|