|
Posted by Spex on 04/13/07 17:17
nappy wrote:
> Spex.. do you think shake is a better compositor than Combustion?
>
>
By a long long way.
As you might know/remember I was a big fan of combustion on the PC but
since switching full time to Shake I haven't looked back. Once you get
into Shake you realise the likes of After Effects and combustion are
missing a lot of tools that are required for doing compositing at the
highest quality level. It's the difference between being nearly right
to being absolutely right.
Shake is entirely useless as a motion graphics tool it is just not what
it is designed for whereas combustion excels in that field. Before
someone replies and say Shake can do motion graphics, yeah ok if you are
a complete masochist.
Horses for courses...as always.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|