|
Posted by nappy on 04/13/07 18:02
"Spex" <No.spam@ta.com> wrote in message
news:461fbb32$0$8748$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
> nappy wrote:
>> Spex.. do you think shake is a better compositor than Combustion?
>>
>>
> By a long long way.
>
> As you might know/remember I was a big fan of combustion on the PC but
> since switching full time to Shake I haven't looked back. Once you get
> into Shake you realise the likes of After Effects and combustion are
> missing a lot of tools that are required for doing compositing at the
> highest quality level. It's the difference between being nearly right to
> being absolutely right.
>
> Shake is entirely useless as a motion graphics tool it is just not what it
> is designed for whereas combustion excels in that field. Before someone
> replies and say Shake can do motion graphics, yeah ok if you are a
> complete masochist.
>
> Horses for courses...as always.
good one.. thanks
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|