|
|
Posted by dgates on 04/24/07 04:01
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:09:44 -0400, Sean O'Hara <seanohara@gmail.com>
wrote:
>In the Year of the Golden Pig, the Great and Powerful Jay G. declared:
>>
>> It's doubtful anyone of importance is going to "get rid" of 2.35:1 as a
>> viable aspect ratio. You can feel free to boycott any titles released in
>> 2.35:1, although it's doubtful the movie studios are going to miss your
>> single rental of their title.
>
>Well, he can buy the DVD of Gilliam's Tideland, which does indeed
>crop the 2:35:1 theatrical ratio to 1:77:1.
It does? Why does it do that? Who picked which pieces to chop off?
It surely doesn't cut straight down the middle, does it?
Is there also a "widescreen version?"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|