|
Posted by Jay G. on 04/26/07 13:12
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:00:01 -0700, WinField wrote:
>
> [FS still has] more detail. Not just being closer to objects.
>
> Wrinkles around the eyes. Skin pores. Easier to see the threads and
> weave of cloth. Small text/print on objects not as fuzzy.
So to clarify, the 4:3 version shows less actual image, but that reduced
image is shown in more detail than that portion of the image is on the WS
DVD. correct?
So this proves that the 4:3 version is not "reprocessed" from the WS DVD
and isn't an inherently "VHS quality", less resolution or less detailed
version of the film, as Derek originally asserted.
-Jay
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|