|
|
Posted by Richard C. on 04/27/07 01:53
"WinField" <doghouse@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:CG2Yh.267126$7g3.183849@newsfe14.phx...
>
>
> Jay G. wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:00:01 -0700, WinField wrote:
>>
>>>[FS still has] more detail. Not just being closer to objects.
>>>
>>> Wrinkles around the eyes. Skin pores. Easier to see the threads and
>>> weave of cloth. Small text/print on objects not as fuzzy.
>>
>>
>> So to clarify, the 4:3 version shows less actual image, but that reduced
>> image is shown in more detail than that portion of the image is on the WS
>> DVD. correct?
>
> Exactly. This is what I have discovered with "Die Another Day".
>
> When I get a chance, I hope to compare one or two more flicks in the same
> way.
>
>
>> So this proves that the 4:3 version is not "reprocessed" from the WS DVD
>> and isn't an inherently "VHS quality", less resolution or less detailed
>> version of the film, as Derek originally asserted.
>>
>> -Jay
>
> Indeed. Derek's comments on this subject were really over-the-top WS
> fanboy dribble.
>
=======================
You realize that the up to 43% of the movie that is cropped in a
pan-and-scan
version has Z E RO resolution!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|