|
|
Posted by ushere on 05/12/07 00:11
Ken Maltby wrote:
> "ushere" <removethis.leslie.wand@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:TpR0i.36248$M.35465@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> Kill Bill wrote:
>>> Well this is official.. Canon has introduced their first AVCHD
>>> camcorder.
>>>
>>> http://www.usa.canon.com/html/templatedata/pressrelease/20070507_hr10.html
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not a big fan of straight to DVD, however, the DVDs this
>>> creates are AVCHD dics, and not regular DVDs. It's more of a
>>> storage medium actually. But either way HDD, flash, or DVD.
>>>
>>> But either way.. This makes 3 major brands now supporting AVCHD.
>>> Hello Apple, Avid, and Adobe.. The writing is on the walls.. They
>>> need to start supporting AVCHD now!
>>>
>>> -bill
>> why, out of curiosity?
>>
>> it's by far from being a professional format.
>>
>> leslie
>
> Both of these Newsgroups begin with rec.video not all video needs to
> be "professional" to be valid, useful, enjoyable, worth while, to
> those of us with ""only"" a recreational interest in video.
>
> Luck; Ken
>
>
wasn't intended to be a put-down - simply questioning the op's thought that:
>>> Apple, Avid, and Adobe.. The writing is on the walls.. They need
>>> to
start
>>> supporting AVCHD now!
why? there's a plethora of relatively cheap software out there that will
handle avchd,
if someone is going to invest in any of those programs (i use vegas
which DOES support avchd), then why would they spend $500+ on a program
and then use a crappy camera. and yes, i did say crappy camera because
at the moment, it looks like all the avchd cameras are built like
fisher-price toys, with awful lens', and and little thought as to sound,
etc.,
leslie.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|