|
|
Posted by ushere on 05/23/07 13:20
Spex wrote:
>>> We should be seeing the introduction of the 72 Mbps and 100 Mbps
>>> systems now.
>> Do you really think that we need 100 Mbps XDCAM HD? Maybe if it was
>> 4:2:2 with 59.94 full progressive 1920 by 1080 frames per second
>> (50 frames in PAL areas). MPEG-2 422P@HL (4:2:2 Progressive Profile
>> at High Level) at 100 Mbps happens to meet this requirement.
>>
>
> It is going to be interesting to see whether XDCAM HD has much of a
> life span and ever reach the lofty promises that Sony made about it.
> Even XDCAM HD's disc based media might look quaint in 18 months. I'm
> sure the Xpresscard memory sticks will become ubiquitous in that time
> span.
>
> Memory cards and direct recording to HDDs seem to e the biggest
> threat but if XDCAM HD is to continue will albeit an updated codec
> and increase in bit-rate is always necessary.
>
> I can't see too much requirement for greater than HD or 2k recording
> at least for broadcast media so I would assume the next development
> to eat into the bandwidth reserve will be enhanced colour resolution
> and depth caused by much improved latitude from the camera front-end.
> So son of XDCAM would need 100++ Mbps.
>
> Who would be an owner operator at this time? Very costly if you back
> the wrong horse...
>
> S
well put. but i'm still more concerned that what we seem to be getting
is glossier, ultra manipulated, shallow crap. i mean, it wont be long
before we have the news being read by paris hilton, doco's on the rise
of the handbag as a fashion extension (6 X 1hr episodes - of 40 minute
length to allow for ads), squeezed in between whatever sport they can
find to commercialise. how about extreme chess, marathon underwater
swimming, etc.,
yes, just when i thought my new hdv camcorder would last a couple of
years, i'm now reading about the next gen...
leslie
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|