|
Posted by Ty Ford on 06/01/07 01:06
On Thu, 31 May 2007 10:13:06 -0400, Richard Crowley wrote
(in article <135tlvgcm3q3i8b@corp.supernews.com>):
> "Ty Ford" wrote ...
>> I'm not trying to please the majority of the people. I'm trying to
>> please my
>> client. I've actually had shooter/editors call me from the edit bay to
>> thank
>> me for how good the audio is. Especially when I have opted for a boom
>> mic
>> rather than a lav. Of course, there's more to it than the boom/lav
>> issue, but
>> it ain't about an EQ tweek, it's about making your client look (or
>> sound)
>> good. Using the best tools does make a difference if you're using them
>> right.
>>
>> That's how you get a good reputation and how you end up with more
>> clients
>> than you can serve. That's called making a living. :)
>
> Absolutely. Note, however, in this particicular case the
> OP is shooting some DIY instructional videos in the
> back bedroom. Nothing about the description of the
> circumstances suggests that a shotgun would be a better
> choice than a lav.
>
I'm in complete agreement. However, I have been on shoots where, even when a
hyper was hangable no more than 14 inches away, the lav won.
Regards,
Ty
--Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services
Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com
Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|